I know my neighbors are asking, What’s the next step in the rent stabilization policy process? Doesn’t everyone think this way? Well, this coming Thursday City Council will continue discussing the implementation of the new rent stabilization policy. Council will focus on two issues: the creation of a rental unit database & registry to track tenancies across rent-stabilized properties; and identifying a format for facilitated roundtable(s) that would bring residents and landlords together later this year around an equitable rent stabilization policy. Get ready for an important meeting!
You might have heard this campaign slogan coined in New York about ten years ago: “The rent is too damn high.” Around that slogan a titular leader emerged and a new political party was formed: The Rent Is Too Damn High Party. It has run candidates for both Mayor and Governor, but it hasn’t scored a win at the ballot box (yet). Well, the rent is too damned high here, too, and so that’s a message that resonates in Beverly Hills – a city of restive tenants bracing for the 60-day notice and otherwise concerned that our allowable increase may creep back up towards the old 10%.
The final Beverly Hills City Council election results were posted by Los Angeles County today. After a prolonged bit of suspense because the County, for the first time in my memory, administered our election, now the tallies are in. What a nail-biter!
Last week the Beverly Hills Courier endorsed Nancy Krasne for City Council. She was the newspaper’s only endorsed candidate even though seven candidates are in the running for three open seats on March 7th. The Courier calls Krasne a “strong supporter” of the police, noting that she voted to extend to officers a 10% raise in the latest contract. Yes, Krasne’s support for the police is generous considering that our city owes $330M in unfunded pension liabilities and the raise will only increase that liability. The Courier has crusaded against runaway personnel costs. Why endorse Krasne?
Yesterday I sent out an email blast to a segment of my Alliance email list wherein I summarized recent changes to the Beverly Hills rent stabilization ordinance. In it, I came out against the re-election of City Council candidate Nancy Krasne, our Vice Mayor. Shortly afterward, I received a call from an angry Nancy Krasne. “How dare you?” she asked, and she demanded a “retraction.” The remainder of the Alliance email list received a blast with two paragraphs scrubbed-out in order to soften the non-endorsement. However I never should have put personal considerations ahead of tenants, and I regret that some email recipients didn’t get the whole message.
City Council baked tenants a full loaf of protections when it unanimously adopted an ‘urgency ordinance’ in January: annual rent increases were limited to 3% and significant relocation fees for an involuntary tenancy termination put the brake on no-cause evictions. Residents who rent have waited for such protections for 30 years! But a month on, it looks like landlords have gobbled half of our loaf!
I want to thank everyone who responded to my Renters Alliance email and showed up to City Council this past Tuesday. Some were reluctant to speak up, but many of you did with heartfelt comments and observations. Unfortunately, our recommendations on the proposed ordinance, which was released Friday evening on a holiday weekend, were lost in our only <em>one-and-a-half minutes at the microphone</em>. So much for democracy: we saw a fully-baked set of half-loaf policies essentially blessed by City Council. (The other half of the loaf was gobbled by the landlords.)
Remember when City Council proclaimed a housing crisis and drafted the original Urgency Ordinance to tame runaway rents and tamp down no-cause evictions? In the last few weeks so-called ‘mom-and-pop’ landlords besieged City Hall. They got an assist from the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles (an industry association). And they seem to have checked-off their wish-list of policies to benefit themselves at our expense. IF WE DON’T STAND UP WE WILL LOSE OUR PROTECTIONS.
We are a couple of weeks past the City Council’s urgency ordinance and the important renter protections it put into place in January. We now are hurtling toward a very significant City Council meeting on Tuesday, February 21 at 7PM. Now is the time to pay attention! Renters Alliance has been in a huddle the past week. And we created a website to get the word out. Now it is time to really organize. Where do we go from here?
Beverly Hills City Council felt your pain. Last night, we tenants secured from sympathetic councilmembers greatly-expanded protections. Gone are 10% rent increases. Gone are evictions without relocation fees. In a Council meeting that stretched to midnight and beyond, we heard some tales of landlord hardship but many more persuasive accounts of how tenants invest in our communities only to be tossed out summarily or handed a slow-motion eviction order in the form of successive, capricious rent hikes. At 1a.m. City Council used a seldom-invoked ‘urgency ordinance’ to approve several critical reforms to our rent stabilization ordinances.
City Council meets TONIGHT at 7pm and we need your calls, emails and in-person comments. If you care about residential stability for tenants please join us! We expect City Council to OK a registry of rental units, a necessary foundation for a rent stabilization program. All are critical to the success of a reformed rent stabilization program for Beverly Hills.
My household just received our second consecutive annual near-10% increase and we’re mad as hell. We’ve had years of steady increases and now we are paying double what we did at move-in. Why? Because so-called rent stabilization policies in Beverly Hills don’t do the job of stabilizing rents. It fails to protect tenants from no-just-cause evictions. And it allows landlords a tool for the slow-motion eviction: a 10% annual increase. Ours is the only rent-stabilized city that extends no greater protections than state law for the majority of our tenants.